Skip to content

RI Senate passes health insurance exchange bill despite flap over abortion amendment

April 5, 2011

It’s official.  The Rhode Island Senate today passed bill 2011-S 0087A, which would create a “public corporation” to design the state’s health insurance exchange. The vote was 31-6, with one member not voting.

Among the more notable and surprising people that voted “No” was Senator Josh Miller, an active participant in reforming the state’s health care system.  When I asked him why, he said he was against an amendment to the bill that would restrict access to abortions.

This amendment was originally described to me as a restating of federal regulations related to abortions on the health insurance exchange.  Senator Miller says apparently that’s not true. Here’s the full text of that amendment-

No health plan under which coverage is purchased in whole or in part with any state or federal funds through the exchange, shall provide coverage for induced abortions, except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or where the  pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. Coverage is deemed to be purchased with state or federal funds if any tax credit or cost sharing credit is applied toward the health plan. This subsection does not prevent an insurer from providing any person or entity with an optional rider, for which there must be paid a separate premium for induced abortions; providing, however, that such coverage is not purchased in whole or part with any state or federal funds.

Senator Miller says there weren’t enough votes to pass an amendment to change this amendment, so it was withdrawn. Here’s the list of everyone who voted against the legislation-

N  MILLER

NV  MOURA

N  NESSELBUSH

N  PERRY

N  PICHARDO

N  SOSNOWSKI

N  TASSONI

The bill now heads to a hearing in the House Health Education, and Welfare Committee on Wednesday the 13th.  I’m still investigating what might happen with this abortion amendment.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Edward R. Carr permalink
    January 26, 2012 6:09 am

    In this bill the statement, No health plan under which coverage is purchased in whole or in part with any state or federal funds through the exchange, shall provide coverage for induced abortions, except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. This causes me alarm that people may call a unwanted Pregnancy something else, causing the Justus system to get involved to solve injustices to terminate the pregnancy?

Trackbacks

  1. Executive order may create RI’s health insurance exchange « The Pulse: health care in RI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: